Cases 11 - 20 of 424
Pinson v. Warden of USP-Allenwood
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bernard Battle v. Warden Canaan USP
as 23-3261
Plaintiff:
BERNARD BATTLE
Defendant:
WARDEN CANAAN USP
Sean Moffitt v. Warden Coleman USP, et al
as 23-3173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN MOFFITT
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN COLEMAN USP, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Demontray Ward v. Enigk, et al
as 23-2958
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMONTRAY WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ENIGK, Psychiatric Dr. at USP-Lewisburg, LT. TROUTMAN, USP-Lewisburg, LT. LEONWICZ and others
Thomas Waters v. BOP, et al
as 23-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLUCK, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY FLORENCE and others
Noah Sumter v. Warden Canaan USP
as 23-2472
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOAH SUMTER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CANAAN USP
Charles Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 23-2336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES GARY BRUCE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Swint v. United States Penitentiary at Allenwood
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL SWINT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AT ALLENWOOD, Warden at USP Allenwood, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. United States District Court for the Northern District (2nd Cir.) of New York
as 3:2023cv01092
Petitioner:
Joshua Shafer
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Northern District (2nd Cir.) of New York and Warden, USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
