Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Proch v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 16-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAUREAN XAVIER PROCH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Phillips v. Institution of USP Florence et al
as 1:2015cv01121
Plaintiff:
Darrell Phillips
Defendant:
Institution of USP Florence, Cozza-Rhodes, A.W. Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fay v. Maye
as 15-3035
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEIGHTON FAY
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USP Leavenworth
Nez, Jr. v. Four Unknown Officers, USP Florence
as 1:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
Calvin J. Nez, Jr.
Defendant:
Four Unknown Officers, USP Florence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCoy v. Maye
as 15-3029
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USP Leavenworth
Winegar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2014cv03196
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Winegar
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Leavenworth, Clinical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hughes v. Oliver
as 14-1297
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY LOUIS HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN OLIVER, Warden, USP Florence-High
Leishman v. Patterson, et al
as 14-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP M. LEISHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM PATTERSON, Executive Director of the UDOC, MIKE HADDON, Deputy Director of the UDOC, LOWELL CLARK, Director of Institutional Operations for UDOC and others
Gordon v. Berkebile, et al
as 14-1197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHEOUS L. GORDON, AKA Orville Owen
Defendant - Appellee:
D. BERKEBILE, Warden, K. FLUCK, Case manager, W. HAYGOOD, Counselor and others
Hanson v. Sherrod, et al
as 13-5100
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD HANSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM A. SHERROD, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, USP Pollock, Louisiana and E. SCOTT PRUITT, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
