Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
Raymond Roseboro v. Warden
as 23-5247
Petitioner / Appellant:
Raymond R. Roseboro
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden, USP Yazoo City
Tsunami Khan v. Avery, et al
as 22-5251
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tsunami Khan, also known as Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Avery, Capt, USP Thompson, United States Attorney General, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
ATKINSON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Petitioner:
FREDERICK ATKINSON
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSIONER and WARDEN, USP BEAUMONT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JAMES v. BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
as 1:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
CALVIN JAMES
Respondent:
BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
as 1:2021cv03131
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant:
BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv03086
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCC COLEMAN USP I and FCI JESUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENNINGS v. MCKANE et al
as 1:2021cv01228
Defendant:
YANASH, P. ADAMS MCKANE, JORGE and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GORBEY v WARDEN
as 1:2021cv01570
Respondent:
WARDEN OF USP-LEWISBURG
Petitioner:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv03173
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
