Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Torres v. USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Defendant:
USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. USP Beaumont et al
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Andre'a D Johnson
Defendant:
USP Beaumont, USP Beaumont Medical Dept, I Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. USP Beaumont et al
as 9:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Andre'a D Johnson
Defendant:
USP Beaumont, USP Beaumont Medical Dept, I Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Krohn v. USP Warden et al
as 4:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Nikko Krohn
Defendant:
USP Warden, USP Capt. Obrian, SIS Mcbride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. USP Beaumont Staff et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Andre'a Darius Johnson
Defendant:
USP Beaumont Staff, USP Medical Staff and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vital v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jackson Ruben Vital
Defendant:
Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden USP Beaumont, Captain USP Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Sherman Lamont Fields
Defendant:
Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Health Services Division BOP, Warden USP Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burks v. Ramos et al
as 1:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Elmontha Burks
Defendant:
L Ramos and USP Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. USP Beaumont
as 7:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Defendant:
USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
