Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Toliver v. USP Lee
as 7:2019cv00213
Defendant:
USP Lee
Plaintiff:
Lester Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enriquez v. Warden of USP Lee
as 7:2018cv00409
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of USP Lee
Defendant:
O.M. Owens
Petitioner:
Enrique Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. USMS et al
as 1:2015cv01456
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
USMS, FBI, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. US Marshal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, FBI, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbati v. Warden, USP Lee County
as 7:2013cv00048
Petitioner:
Nicholas Barbati
Respondent:
Warden, Beckley Federal Correctional Institution and Warden, USP Lee County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Descamps v. Bush et al
as 7:2011cv00251
Defendant:
W. Anders, Bush, SIS Lts. Florence and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Descamps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boone vs. Warden, USP Lee County
as 7:2011cv00204
Petitioner:
GARY DEAN BOONE
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, FCI ALLENWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States Penitentiary Lee (Lee USP)
as 7:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Smith
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Lee (Lee USP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2009cv00288
Plaintiff:
Robert Ethan Miller
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Staff at USP Coleman, Staff at USP Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2009cv00239
Petitioner:
Robert Ethan Miller
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
