Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Unified Holding International et al v. NATURES ENERGY BANC, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv10491
Plaintiff:
Unified Holding International , Unified Energies International and Clay Clark
Defendant:
Natures Energy Banc, Inc , Jeffrey L. Bancroft and Black Horse Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unified Holding International et al v. Naatures Energy Banc, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00489
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bancroft, Black Horse Energy, LLC and Naatures Energy Banc, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clay Clark, Unified Energies International and Unified Holding International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Unified Holdings International et al v. NATURES ENERGY BANC, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00490
Defendant:
JEFFREY BANCROFT, BLACK HORSE ENERGY, LLC and NATURES ENERGY BANC, INC.
Plaintiff:
Clay Clark, Unified Energies International and Unified Holdings International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Field et al v. Unified Holding International et al
as 2:2010cv12829
Plaintiff:
Dana Field , Nature's Energy and Jeffrey L. Bancroft
Defendant:
Unified Holding International , Unified Energies International , Clay Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unified Holdings LLC vs Optical Products Development, et al
as 8:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Unified Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Optical Products Development Corp. and Kenneth Westort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Unified Holdings v. Optical Products Development et al
as 8:2007cv00423
Plaintiff:
Unified Holdings
Defendant:
Optical Products Development and Kenneth Westort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robin Sanders v. OMG IV, Limited et al
as 2:2007cv05193
Plaintiff:
Robin Sanders and Robin Sanders
Defendant:
OMG IV, Limited, Hill Country Interests, Inc., Beta Corp Management Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
