Cases 1 - 10 of 89
ZEMEL v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ZEMEL
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ROJAS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv03765
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DAVID ROJAS
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2023cv23025
Plaintiff:
JOEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
LANGLEY v. UNITED AIRLINES INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20602
Plaintiff:
BRENDAN LANGLEY
Cross Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES INC.
Defendant:
UNITED GROUND EXPRESS INC., PHILLIPE FRANCOIS RIVERA, EDWARD CETNAR and others
Cross Claimant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and LOUIS P. KLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VAFAEI-MAKHSOOS et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20442
Plaintiff:
SHILDA VAFAEI-MAKHSOOS and ANDREW RUONA
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv17566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
NATARAJAN v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC
as 2:2023cv03402
Plaintiff:
BRENDA NATARAJAN
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
AGRAWAL v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
MUKESH AGRAWAL
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
