Cases 21 - 30 of 235
Scotto v. M. Dyer and Sons et al
as 8:2018cv01663
Defendant:
Apple, Microsoft, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scotto v. McCleans et al
as 8:2018cv01662
Defendant:
Apple, Microsoft, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scotto v. United States, et al
as 8:2018cv01495
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
United States, Mary A. Scotto, Angela Mary Alba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Marques v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04159
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc. , UAL Corporation and United Continental Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Virginia Ribeir Marques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUFF v. UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv08693
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. HUFF
Defendant:
UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. and UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03348
Plaintiff:
Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc. and United Continental Holdings, Inc.
Howard Neft v. UAL, et al
as 18-1712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD S. NEFT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scotto v. United States et al
as 8:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Education, EDFIOAManager@us.ed.gov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08858
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc. and United Continental Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
