Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Nunn v. Duke Energy Active Health & Welfare Benefit (Financed) Plans et al
as 3:2018cv00541
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Nunn
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Duke Energy Active Health & Welfare Benefit (Financed) Plans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bryson et al v. United HealthCare Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Craig Bryson and Laura Bryson
Defendant:
United HealthCare Insurance Company , United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Connextions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ferncreek Cardiology, P.A. et al v. United Healthcare of North Carolina, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00432
Plaintiff:
Ferncreek Cardiology, P.A. and Premier Cardiovascular Center, P.A.
Defendant:
United Healthcare of North Carolina, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Company, Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Northern Hospital District of Surry County et al v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
Northern Hospital District of Surry County and Surry Regional Health Services, Inc.
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., UnitedHealth Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rouse v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Poinsetta Rouse
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
United Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Richards et al
as 3:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Dawn Richards and EyeMed Vision Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
