Cases 51 - 60 of 335
DAVIS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 3:2022cv21526
Plaintiff:
ARIANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVIS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 3:2022cv21524
Plaintiff:
ARIANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frohsin v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 2:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
Carolyn M Frohsin
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
The Estate of Samuel I. Roig, et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 22-13043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, KYLE ROIG, an individual, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual
Mathews v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Adrian Mathews
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
United Parcel Service Inc. v. Cherry
as 1:2022cv02874
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth Cherry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
