Labor Cases
MORRISON v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff: RONDA S. MORRISON
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
UNITED REFINING COMPANY INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES et al v. MORRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00238
Plaintiff: UNITED REFINING COMPANY INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES and ROBERT KAEMMERER
Defendant: DALLAS Q. MORRISON and MARK WILLIAM PRATT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1332
COTTILLION et al v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00140
Plaintiff: JOHN COTTILLION and BEVERLY ELDRIDGE
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY, UNITED REFINING COMPANY PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES, UNITED REFINING COMPANY RETIREMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
GENERAL TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 397 v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY
as 1:2008cv00357
Plaintiff: GENERAL TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 397
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
SCHRECKONGOST v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv00124
Plaintiff: CHARLES D. SCHRECKONGOST
Defendant: UNITED REFINING COMPANY, UNITED REFINING COMPANY PENSION PLAN and LAWRENCE A. LOUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?