Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association, et al
as 24-1115
Plaintiff:
ALLAN M. LEAVITT, Individually, and as Class Representative and JOHN DOE 1-100
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a Texas Department of Insurance Regulated Reciprocal Inter-insurance Exchange and Subsidiary, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY
Leavitt et al v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 4:2023cv11341
Plaintiff:
Allan M Leavitt and J. Doe 1 - 100
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association, GEICO Indemnity Company, The Commerce Insurance Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association, et al
as 21-1561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLAN M. LEAVITT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, STUART PARKER, individually and as Chief Operating Officer of United Services Automobile Association, WAYNE PEACOCK, individually and as Chief Operating Officer of United Services Automobile Association and others
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 1:2020cv12130
Plaintiff:
Allan M Leavitt
Defendant:
Lamontagne, Spaulding and Hayes, LLP, Stuart Parker, Lynn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United Services Automobile Association v. Aguiar et al
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
United Services Automobile Association
Defendant:
Guilhermina Aguiar , Paul Aguiar , Utica Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
