Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 63
United States ex rel A. Fzco v. Supreme Foodservice, GMBH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1845
Defendant / Appellee: SUPREME FOODSERVICE, GMBH, HAJI OBAIDULLAH SADE KHAIL, SUPREME GROUP USA LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES EX. REL ANHAM FZCO, Bringing this action on behalf of the United States of America, c/o United States Attorney EDVA and William Barr Attorney General of the United States and UNITED STATES EX. REL ASADULLAH SADERKHAIL, Bringing this action on behalf of the United States of America, c/o United States Attorney EDVA and William Barr Attorney General of the United States
United States ex rel. Taylor v. Michael Boyko
as 20-1661
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. CORTNEY TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee: MARTIN GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, EMCARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, BESTPRACTICES, INC. and others
US ex rel. Stephen Gugenheim v. Meridian Senior Living, LLC
as 20-1583
Defendant / Appellee: ZHI, LLC, WP-RALEIGH HEALTH, LLC, MERIDIAN SENIOR LIVING SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA EX REL. STEPHEN GUGENHEIM and UNITED STATES EX REL. STEPHEN GUGENHEIM
Aarow Contracting, Inc. v. Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
as 8:2019cv00692
Plaintiff: United States ex rel Aarow Contracting, Inc. and Aarow Contracting, Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
U.S. ex rel. David Grant v. United Airlines, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. DAVID GRANT
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
:
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States ex rel. Cody v. Mantech International
as 17-1757
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. KEVIN CODY AND MUGE CODY
Defendant - Appellee: MANTECH INTERNATIONAL, Corporation
:
United States ex rel. Cody v. Mantech International We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1722
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES EX REL. KEVIN CODY AND MUGE CODY
Defendant - Appellant: MANTECH INTERNATIONAL, Corporation
:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?