Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,702
Davis v. United States, et al
as 24-3027
Plaintiff: ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, City of Washington, District of Columbia, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. and others
Oloa v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00187
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Michael Hans Oloa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis (ID 6598) v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv03029
Plaintiff: Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant: United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
United States v. Hamett
as 24-5017
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RANDY ALAN HAMETT
Lindamood v. Jordan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: James Kevin Lindamood
Defendant: Suzanne Jordan, Terry Park, Choctaw County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Rice
as 24-4012
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BROK ARLIN RICE
Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1036
Petitioner: NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMAX SUPERINTENDENT CUSTODIAN, UNITED STATES PORBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF COLORADO and others
Adams v. United States
as 24-1037
Plaintiff: ERIC ADAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Taylor v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00089
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Terrence Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?