Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 42,488
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03178
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03176
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03177
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03175
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Matava
as 24-1132
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN MATAVA
United States of America v. Haxhaj (Beltran)
as 24-1135
Defendant: BORIS BELTRAN, SHPENDIM HAXHAJ, YELTSIN BELTRAN and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The New York State Public Service Commission v. United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
as 24-1126
Petitioner: THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Respondent: UNITED STATES FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Monjarrez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner: BELINDA ARACELY MONJARREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff: SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Lewis v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 24-1140
Plaintiff: RACQUEL LEWIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?