Cases 11 - 20 of 4,064
Purtilo v. USA
as 1:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Robert Purtilo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. $57,272.00 in U.S. Currency
as 4:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$57,272.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Rayshawn Hall and Ra Niya Gibson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Lownsbury v. USA
as 5:2024cv00744
Petitioner:
Ryan P. Lownsbury
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Carson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00722
Petitioner:
Adam Carson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ladd v. USA
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
Brad R. Ladd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Etheridge
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Montez Etheridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Darst
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory A. Darst
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Harris v. USA
as 1:2024cv00607
Petitioner:
Jaylen Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Washington v. USA
as 5:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Jimmie L. Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
