Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Layzer v. Leavitt
as 11-1922
Plaintiff:
Judith M. Layzer
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ray J. Fischer and Kathryn C. Schneider, as Executor of the Estate of Judith M. Layzer
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary in his official capacity, of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Alley v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 4:2010cv11743
Plaintiff:
Diane Louise Alley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KGV Easy Leasing Corporation v. Michael Leavitt
as 10-55323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KGV EASY LEASING CORPORATION, a corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("DHHS")
Robert Henderson v. Department of Health and Human
as 09-10863
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT R. HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Eugene Ostrovsky v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2008cv07656
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ostrovsky
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, -, Secretary of Health and Human Services, National Heritage Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Butterfield Health Care II, Inc. v. Leavitt et al
as 1:2008cv03604
Petitioner:
Butterfield Health Care II, Inc., Butterfield Health Care II, Inc. and Butterfield Health Care II, Inc.
Respondent:
Michael Leavitt, Kerry Weems, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Medassist-Op, Inc. v. Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 8:2007cv02273
Plaintiff:
Medassist-Op, Inc. and Medassist-Op, Inc.
Defendant:
Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
