Cases 1 - 6 of 6
POHL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2013cv00930
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAEL POHL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GENEVA COLLEGE v. SEBELIUS et al
as 2:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
GENEVA COLLEGE
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA SOLIS, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
POHL v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 2:2009cv01480
Plaintiff:
AMY K. POHL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
