Cases 1 - 10 of 15
State of Texas et al v. Brooks-LaSure et al
as 6:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Defendant:
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tice-Harouff v. Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Cami Jo Tice-Harouff
Defendant:
Carole Johnson, Health Resources and Services Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Tyler Area Chamber of Commerce
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Texas, et al v. Richter, et al
as 6:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Elizabeth Richter and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Isom v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 4:2021cv00274
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N. Isom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terkel et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 6:2020cv00564
Defendant:
Director Robert R. Redfield, ActingChief of Staff Nina Witkofsky, Secretary Alex Azar and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Terkel, Lufkin Creekside Apartments, Ltd., Lufkin Creekside Apartments II, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Texoma Orthopedic and Spine, P.L.L.C. v. Alex M. Azar, II et al
as 4:2019cv00936
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Treasury, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff:
Texoma Ortho & Spine, PLLC and Texoma Orthopedic and Spine, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
