Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Jessica Smith, Joel Wallskog, M.D., Theodore Cabaniss, on behalf of his minor son, T.C. and others
Defendant: United States of America, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff: U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Inc., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Humana Inc. et al v. Becerra et al
as 4:2023cv00909
Plaintiff: Humana Inc. and Humana Benefit Plan of Texas, Inc.
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Van Duyne et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 4:2022cv00122
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Van Duyne and The State of Texas
Defendant: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle P. Walensky, Sherri A Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. Becerra, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00300
Plaintiff: State of Texas and Lubbock Independent School District
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA,, United States Department of Health and Human Services, JOOYUEN CHANG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas v. Optum Services Inc et al
as 3:2021cv02838
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas
Defendant: Optum Services Inc, Michael Dodds, Law Office of B Ward Maedgen PC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: The People and Culture Committee, Texas Health, The Governance Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
State of Texas et al v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00229
Plaintiff: State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA,, United States Department of Health and Human Services, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE and others
Petitioner: Representative Chip Roy
Amicus Curiae: Representative Michael Burgess, Representative Dan Crenshaw, Representative Jake Ellzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2019cv02857
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M Azar, II
Plaintiff: Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
Intervenor Plaintiff: Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, Baylor Health Care System and Texas Health Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Belmonte et al v. MedStar Mobile Healthcare et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01867
Plaintiff: Cecelia Belmonte, Manuel Belmonte and Sophia Belmonte
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services Center for Disease Control and Prevention, MedStar Mobile Healthcare, Planned Parenthood Southwest Fort Worth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Conduent State Healthcare LLC et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2017cv02423
Plaintiff: Conduent State Healthcare LLC and Foley Hoag LLP
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?