Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Colorado Christian University v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Colorado Christian University
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 5:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Respondent:
United States Attorney General, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Sierra Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hobby Lobby Stores, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 12-6294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., MARDEL, INC., DAVID GREEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc et al v. Sebelius et al
as 5:2012cv01000
Plaintiff:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc , Mardel Inc , David Green and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Hilda Solis and others
Amicu:
Orrin G Hatch , Daniel R Coats , Thad Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Colorado Christian University v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2011cv03350
Plaintiff:
Colorado Christian University
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Patterson v. Park University et al
as 2:2010cv02687
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Patterson
Defendant:
Park University, Avila University, United States Postal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
