Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Larry Wood v. HUD
as 20-1161
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY EDWARD WOOD and JESSICA ANN WOOD
Debtor:
In re: LARRY EDWARD WOOD
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Alan Pitts v. United States Housing
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN PITTS and SENECA NICHOLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ATLANTA HOME OWNERSHIP CENTER, JENNIFER HARRY and others
HUD v. Michael Corey
as 12-2239
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Office of the Secretary, on behalf of: Delores Walker, G.W., by and through Delores Walker, his legal guardian,
Respondent:
MICHAEL COREY
Michael Corey v. HUD
as 12-2096
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COREY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Office of the Secretary
Ronnie Dyson v. Brian Liggan
as 12-1101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONNIE DYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN LIGGAN, Virginia Capital Realty Property Manager of 1514 Perry Street, Richmond, VA 23224, DAVID LIGGAN, Virginia Capital Realty Property Manager of 1514 Perry Street, Richmond, VA 23224, VIRGINIA CAPITAL REALTY, Fannie Mae (Owner) and others
Georgia Gilchrist v. Raman Bakshi
as 10-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGIA L. GILCHRIST
Plaintiff:
MARIKA G. MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMAN BAKSHI and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
