Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 114
Watterson v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00080
Plaintiff: Blake J Watterson
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana Children's Medical Center v. Attorney General of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01305
Plaintiff: Louisiana Children's Medical Center d/b/a LCMC Health and Louisiana Children's Medical Center doing business as LCMC Health
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: HCA Healthcare Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Consolidated Defendant: Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10463
Intervenor Plaintiff: Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his Official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
HCA Healthcare Inc v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 2:2023cv01311
Plaintiff: HCA Healthcare Inc
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
State of Texas v. Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff: State of Texas
Defendant: Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Amicus Curiae: Ten Members of Congress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Texas et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Steven M Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mock et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff: William T Mock, Christopher Lewis, Firearms Policy Coalition Inc and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Polymer80, Inc. v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv00029
Plaintiff: Polymer80, Inc.
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mock et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2023xc00232
Plaintiff: William T Mock, Christopher Lewis and Firearms Policy Coalition Inc
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?