Cases 1 - 8 of 8
National Organization for Women-New York City v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2023cv06750
Plaintiff:
National Organization for Women-New York City
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Hampton v. Wilkie
as 23-305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Hampton
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis Richard McDonough, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Conyers v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 22-1590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent Curtis Conyers
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Conyers v. United States Department of Ve
as 22-970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent Curtis Conyers
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Shaw v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 17-1122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Daniel Shaw
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert A. McDonald, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Mara Davis, EMS Chief Terry Vogt and others
Defendant:
Merit Systems Protection Board, New York Office and Judge Maureen Briody
Conyers v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Vincent Curtis Conyers
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Odonoghue v. United States Department of Ve
as 12-4799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wycliffe Odonoghue
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Veteran Affairs
Lettman v. United States Government et al
as 1:2012cv06696
Plaintiff:
Maria Lettman
Defendant:
United States Government, United States Department of Veteran Affairs, John Doe "1" - "10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
