Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Nagle et al v. Sebelius et al
as 2:2013cv12036
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nagle , Terrence Nagle, Jr. , James Nagle and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Seth D. Harris and others
Legatus, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-1093
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LEGATUS, WEINGARTZ SUPPLY COMPANY and DANIEL WEINGARTZ, President of Weingartz Supply Company
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Legatus, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-1092
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LEGATUS, DANIEL WEINGARTZ and WEINGARTZ SUPPLY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury and others
Autocam Corporation, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-2673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUTOCAM CORPORATION, AUTOCAM MEDICAL, LLC, JOHN KENNEDY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA L. SOLIS, names as Hilda Solis; Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fryar et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jackie Fryar and Kelley Fryar
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Treasury, Christopher Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
