Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Shade v. Welsh et al
as 3:2019cv00259
Defendant:
Peter J. Welsh and Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff:
Troy Adam Shade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. The United States et al
as 4:2018cv01789
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
The United States and The United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017mc00671
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. SONG, et al
as 2:2017mc00670
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00620
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00604
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANSELL v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2016cv03421
Petitioner:
TYREE MANSELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Malone v. United States District Court
as 4:2016cv01231
Petitioner:
Ricky Ricardo Malone
Respondent:
United States District Court, .
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
