Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 47 of 47
BROWN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv03963
Plaintiff: KEVIN A. BROWN
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LABUDA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3RD CIRCUIT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00910
Petitioner: DEAN JAMES LABUDA
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3RD CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NICHOLAS v. EVANS et al
as 1:2008cv00350
Defendant: SCOTT ARTHUR EVANS, DAUPHIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA and others
Plaintiff: EDWARD JAMES NICHOLAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carroll v. United States District Court
as 4:2008cv02185
Plaintiff: Wesley Carroll
Defendant: United States District Court
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nicholas v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2008cv00009
Plaintiff: Edward James Nicholas
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation, C.J.I.S., PA State Plice Central Repository and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALDERONE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA et al
as 3:2007cv00100
Plaintiff: NIEVES CALDERONE
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY and UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE KIM GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AWALA v. NBC NEWS et al
as 2:2007cv00741
Plaintiff: GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Defendant: NBC NEWS, MSNBC TELEVISION, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIRD CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?