Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 6:2020cv01360
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beth Drake, Donald J Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisenby v. United States District Court
as 5:2020cv01350
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr and Malik Al-Shabazz
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. United States Probation Office et al
as 2:2019cv02212
Plaintiff:
Divine Naquann Whitfield and Shawn Sinclair
Defendant:
Sean Kitrell, Marc P Embler, J Scott Youngblood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Supreme Court of the United States, The et al
as 2:2014cv02243
Plaintiff:
David Lee Garner
Defendant:
Supreme Court of the United States, The, United States Department of Justice, The, United States District Court of Washington DC, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El v. Charleston County General Sessions Court et al
as 1:2014cv01956
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright El
Defendant:
Charleston County General Sessions Court and South Carolina United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2013cv02632
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, State of South Carolina Taxpayers, People of Charleston Taxpayers and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
SCDMH Health Care Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sellers v. Parker et al
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
Aven Lamar Shariff Sellers
Defendant:
Sam Parker, Administrator Richie, Chesterfiled SC Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goist v. United States of America et al
as 0:2007cv02928
Plaintiff:
Paul Benjamin Goist
Defendant:
United States of America, United States District Court, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
