Cases 21 - 30 of 91
MALONEY v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv03162
Defendant:
SECURITY SOCIAL ADMINISTRATION, LICENSES & INSPECTIONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
ATASHO MALONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. DUNKEN DONUTS et al
as 2:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
JOHN JERMAINE JACKSON
Defendant:
DUNKEN DONUTS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and SIXTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv00747
Plaintiff:
JASON L. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEGROME D. DAVIS, PETRESE B. TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017mc00671
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. SONG, et al
as 2:2017mc00670
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00619
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00620
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
