Cases 41 - 48 of 48
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
CAZZIE L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROCHE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv04237
Petitioner:
RICHARD ROCHE, ABDIEL FERMIN AVILA and FELIX ROCHE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451
MOORISH HOLY TEMPLE OF SCIENCE et al v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 2:2010cv04232
Petitioner:
MOORISH HOLY TEMPLE OF SCIENCE, MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA, UNITED WASHITAW DE DUGDAHMOUNDYAH OF THE NAGA MU'UR/ MOOR EMPIRE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and WILLIAM D. QUARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CIARROCCHI v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 3:2009cv02322
Plaintiff:
ENRICO J. CIARROCCHI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLOW v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2008cv02307
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN BLOW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF NEW JERSEY and SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HART v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 2:2008cv01647
Petitioner:
GILBERT HART
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AVILA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 1:2007cv05760
Plaintiff:
ABDIEL F. AVILA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JIHAD v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2007cv04824
Petitioner:
RASHID JIHAD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
