Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv01897
Plaintiff:
MORRIS ALEXANDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSE BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURY v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2016mc01362
Petitioner:
MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MARRON v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2015cv01829
Petitioner:
HERIBERTO EDUARDO MARRON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ELUMENUS LIGHTING CORP. INC. v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2014cv01857
Plaintiff:
ELUMENUS LIGHTING CORP. INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JACKMAN v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2013cv01650
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JACKMAN, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Parks v. Cranston Mitchell, et al
as 11-5358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darrell James Parks
Defendant - Appellee:
Cranston J. Mitchell, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman of United States Parole Commission and others
JONES, JR. v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01340
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. JONES, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, PERDUE and REOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STINE v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2010cv01103
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
