Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Higgins, et al.
as 24-1500
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant: JEANNE HIGGINS, Idaho Panhandle National Forest Supervisor, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior
Helena Hunters and Anglers Association, et al. v. Moore, et al.
as 23-4120
Plaintiff / Appellant: HELENA HUNTERS AND ANGLERS ASSOCIATION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee: RANDY MOORE, in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3627
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
County of Ventura v. United States Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02802
Plaintiff: County of Ventura
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Karina Medina, Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv07171
Plaintiff: Center For Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Desert Survivors and others
Defendant: Deputy Director Nada Wolff Culver, United States Bureau of Land Management, State Director Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Marten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2021cv00005
Defendant: United States Forest Service, United States Fish & Wildlife Service and Leanne Marten
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Marten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2020cv00179
Defendant: United States Forest Service, United States Fish & Wildlife Service and Leanne Marten
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Friends of the Clearwater, et al. v. Higgins, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00243
Defendant: Fish and Wildlife Service, United States, Forest Service, US, Jeanne Higgins and others
Plaintiff: Friends of the Clearwater and Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Intervenor Defendant: Stimson Lumber Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Center for Environmental Law & Policy et al v. State of Washington Department of Ecology et al
as 3:2019cv05602
Petitioner: Wild Fish Conservancy, Center For Environmental Law and Policy and Center for Environmental Law & Policy
Respondent: State of Washington Department of Ecology, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, State of Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?