Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LEWIS v. GOVERNMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv04867
Defendant:
STACY GARRITY, GOVERNMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY and others
Plaintiff:
SAMMEISO LEONARD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SENECA RESOURCES CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
as 1:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
SENECA RESOURCES CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00125
Plaintiff:
MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, ALLEGHENY FOREST ALLIANCE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL, KENT B. CONNAUGHTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
CATALYST ENERGY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
CATALYST ENERGY, INC.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, LEANNE M. MARTEN, ANTHONY V. SCARDINA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
as 1:2008cv00323
Plaintiff:
FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, ALLEGHENY DEFENSE PROJECT and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PAPCO, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
PAPCO, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PENNSYLVANIA OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 1:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION and ALLEGHENY FOREST ALLIANCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, JOEL HOLTROP and KENT CONNAUGHTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
