Cases 1 - 10 of 29
(PS) Akbar v. U.S. Government
as 2:2023cv01547
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Akbar Sr.
Defendant:
United States Government, Marilyn E. Bednarski, Carl E. Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Cain v. Pauigliati et al
as 2:2020cv01768
Defendant:
Barker, Dippilo, Alatary and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamont Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS) Noeldner et al v. United States Government et al
as 2:2019cv02166
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lynn Noeldner and Angela Tearle Noeldner
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, United States Government and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Overton v. United States Government et al
as 2:2019cv01858
Defendant:
Donald Trump and United States Government
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Fuller v. United States Government
as 2:2019cv01655
Defendant:
United States Government
Plaintiff:
Adam Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Noeldner v. United States Government et al
as 2:2019cv00775
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture and United States Government
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Noeldner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. United States Government et al
as 2:2018cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Defendant:
United States Government, California State Republic, Eric Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. United States Government
as 2:2017cv02433
Plaintiff:
Ron Singh
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Smith v. United State Government and Court System et al
as 2:2016cv02937
Plaintiff:
Debbra Ann Smith
Defendant:
United State Government and Court System and Washington DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hull v. Freemasons, et al.
as 2:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
David Hull
Defendant:
Freemasons, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Military and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
