Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
COPELAND et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv23409
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D. and MILDRED JACKSON
Defendant:
JUDGE ANNE THOMPSON, JUDGE FREDA WOLFSON, JUDGE NOEL HILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OBADO v. IUNIVERSE, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv05393
Plaintiff:
DENNIS OBADO
Defendant:
IUNIVERSE, INC., UNITED STATES GIVERNMENT, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OBADO v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 3:2022cv01563
Petitioner:
DENNIS OBADO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, JANE DOE and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH et al v. BIDEN
as 1:2021cv19457
Plaintiff:
ERICH SMITH, FRANK E GARWOOD, MARIBEL LORENZO and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOSEPH ROBINTETTE BIDEN, JR., PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
OBADO v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 3:2020cv12820
Respondent:
FACEBOOK, INC., JANE DOE, YOUTUBE INC. and others
Petitioner:
DENNIS ODHIAMBO OBADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2019cv18970
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE T. CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISS v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2018cv05604
Plaintiff:
ZORANA CRISS
Defendant:
MICAH RICHARDSON, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and TROY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
KEEN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00784
Plaintiff:
JARED LOUIS KEEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT , ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS , FEDERAL COURT EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
