Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 275
Heidi Stirrup, et al v. DOD, et al
as 23-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant: Heidi Stirrup, personally and in her capacity as a member of the United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, Mark Edward Green, personally and in his official capacity as a member of the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors, and a Member of the Unites States House Armed Services Committee, and the United States Congress, Ralph Warren Norman, Jr., personally and in his official capacity as a Member of the United States Congress and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, General, USA (Ret.), in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Bragg v. Jordan
as 23-615
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney for New York County
Defendant / Appellee: Jim Jordan, in his official capacity as Chairman of the committee on the Judiciary and Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: Mark F. Pomerantz
Petitioner: American Center for Law and Justice
Bragg, Jr. v. Jordan
as 23-616
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney for New York County
Defendant / Appellee: Jim Jordan, in his official capacity as Chairman of the committee on the Judiciary and Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: Mark F. Pomerantz
Bragg v. Jordan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03032
Plaintiff: Alvin L. Bragg, Jr.
Defendant: Jim Jordan, Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives and Mark F. Pomerantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Rivera v. United States; U.S. Government; The United States; U.S. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff: Jacinto Rivera
Defendant: United States; U.S. Government; The United States; U.S., Joseph R. Biden, Jr., The Biden-Harris Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Addisa Jahrusalem Francis v. USA, et al
as 22-14194
Petitioner / Appellant: JACQUELINE DENNIS and ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, a.k.a. Jacqueline Dennis
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Magistrelli v. Former US Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Defendant: Former US Attorney, Former United States of America President, Illinois Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff: Karol Dawn Magistrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Schilling v. United States House of Representatives, et al
as 22-5290
Plaintiff / Appellant: Robert Schilling
Defendant / Appellee: United States House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives and others
American Oversight v. HHS, et al
as 22-5281
Plaintiff / Appellant: American Oversight
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Health and Human Services and Office of Management and Budget
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives
Michael Ward, et al v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 22-16473
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL P. WARD, Dr., D.O., husband, KELLI WARD, Dr., D.O., wife and MOLE MEDICAL SERVICES PC, an Arizona Professional Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: BENNIE G. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE JANUARY 6TH ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL, a committee of the United States House of Representatives and T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?