Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Jones v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2020cv03130
Defendant:
(fnu) Baker and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Donzell A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nissen v. Nissen et al
as 1:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Santa Fe County Sheriffs Dept., James Brian Nissen and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nissen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinkfield v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 5:2019cv00597
Plaintiff:
Maurice J Sinkfield
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center, United States Marshal Service and E Forsythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holz v. United States Marshal Service
as 5:2019cv00483
Petitioner:
Timothy Edward Holz
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Love v. Jacobson, et. al.
as 5:2019cv00259
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Interested Party:
United States of America
Vitrano v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv00859
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2018cv02003
Petitioner:
Tommie Perris Crawford
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Ronald L. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Folse v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2016cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin Folse
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Denham, et al
as 16-1072
Petitioner - Appellant:
AUSTIN RAY
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH DENHAM and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Tolbert v. Dodds et al
as 1:2016cv00075
Petitioner:
Donald A. Tolbert
Respondent:
Michael Dodds and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
