Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Kuhl v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alexander Kuhl
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Flowers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv12387
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flowers #13667-040 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers #13667-040
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Collier v. Bowling et al
as 2:2023cv11675
Plaintiff:
Jammie Collier
Defendant:
Dan Bowling, Nathan Satura, Kenneth Monroe and others
Walton v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare et al
as 2:2023cv10169
Plaintiff:
Charles Walton
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, United States Marshal Service, Jonathan Hemingway and others
Sapp v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv13691
Plaintiff:
Lamount M. Sapp
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Lechner v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Francis Lechner
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Marquette County Board of Commissioners, Gerald O. Corkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hills v. United States Marshal Service
as 4:2016cv11798
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Hills
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Kirkland v. Obama et al
as 2:2015cv13017
Plaintiff:
Scott Kirkland
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, Michelle Obama, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
LeBlanc #333019 v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2015cv00649
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. LeBlanc #333019
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
