Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Yuan v. United States Secret Service
as 3:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jianbin Yuan
Defendant:
United States Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodden et al v. Fauci et al
as 3:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
James Rodden, Isaac McLaughlin, Gabriel Escoto and others
Defendant:
Dr. Anthony Fauci, Jeffrey Zients, Natalie Quillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Litman v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2015cv00760
Plaintiff:
Malia Litman
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security , United States Secret Service and Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Minnfee v. United States Secret Service et al
as 4:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Defendant:
United States Secret Service, Rhett Knappen, John White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Thaler et al
as 6:2011cv00269
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Rissie Owens, Governor Rick Perry, Director Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnlee v. United States Secret Service et al
as 3:2011cv00380
Respondent:
Jeff Blackbunn, Innocence Project of Texas and United States Secret Service
Petitioner:
Barry Dewayne Minnlee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnfee v. Associate Counsel FBI et al
as 3:2011cv02271
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Associate Counsel FBI and United State Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Minnfee v. Associate Counsel FBI et al </
as 3:2011cv00384
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Associate Counsel FBI and United State Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerke v. United States Secret Service
as 3:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
Mary Kantara Gerke
Defendant:
United States Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
