Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WATSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE WATSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THOMAS FAUST, OFFICER AKAIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMMONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
KEVON SIMMONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GATLIN v. UNITY HEALTHCARE
as 1:2021cv00432
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL GATLIN
Defendant:
UNITY HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
BANYONG v. UNITY HEALTHCARE
as 1:2017cv02579
Plaintiff:
GERALD BANYONG
Defendant:
UNITY HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01699
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , C. EPHRUSSI , AMY MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MITCHELL v. EPHRUSSI, et al
as 1:2015cv01975
Plaintiff:
WALLACE G. MITCHELL
Defendant:
C. EPHRUSSI , AMY MORGAN , ANN SAVARESE and others
ASHLEY VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01030
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER , AVERA QUEEN OF PEACE , AVERA ST. LUKE'S and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
WILLIAMS v. UNITY HEALTHCARE CLINIC et al
as 1:2009cv01730
Plaintiff:
JAMAR FRANK BUACY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITY HEALTHCARE CLINIC and JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00594
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. SMITH
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. and UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. C.D.F. et al
as 1:2007cv00567
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
C.D.F. and UNITY HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
