Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fernandez v. Jagger
as 23-30909
Plaintiff:
Sergio Garcia Fernandez
Defendant:
Michael Phillip Jagger, professionally known as Mick Jagger; collectively and professionally known as The Rolling Stones, Keith Richards, collectively and professionally known as The Rolling Stones, Universal Music Group, Incorporated and others
Moten v. Def Jam Recordings et al
as 6:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bishop David Paul Moten
Defendant:
DEF JAM RECORDINGS, UMG RECORDINGS, INC, YE f/k/a KANYE WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Paynes v. Woods et al
as 2:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Ivory Paynes
Defendant:
Gloria Woods, Antonio Anderson, Jr, Universal Music Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fernandez v. Jagger et al
as 2:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Sergio Garcia Fernandez
Defendant:
Michael Phillip Jagger, Keith Richards, Universal Music Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Adeyinka v. Demosend et al
as 4:2018cv02542
Defendant:
Gilles Paires, Eric Tony, Patrick Zelnik and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nicolau v. Los Tigres del Norte, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Juan Nicolau
Defendant:
Los Tigres del Norte, Inc., RMS Music Group, Inc., T.N. Music Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Tilley v. Tisdale et al
as 1:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
Michael Tilley
Defendant:
Paul Tisdale, Young Money Records Entertainment, LLC, Cash Money Records, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sanchez v. Universal Music Group, Inc.
as 4:2010cv02993
Plaintiff:
Adan Sanchez
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mills v. Ayala et al
as 2:2008cv05168
Plaintiff:
Rudy Mills and Rudy Mills
Defendant:
Ramon Ayala, VI Music, C&C Artisic Management and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
