Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Culley et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2024cv01273
Plaintiff: Samuel Culley, Thomas Price and Ervan Waters
Defendant: Leland Robinson, Pillow Talk Inc., Ben Ghazi Music, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TufAmerica, Inc. v. Universal Music Publishing, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02585
Plaintiff: TufAmerica, Inc. doing business as Tuff City Records
Defendant: Universal Music Publishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Thomas v. Pizarro et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10159
Plaintiff: Terence Thomas personally known as DJ Master Tee doing business as Master Lab Publishing
Defendant: Tony D Pizarro, Interscope Records, Inc., WB Music Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cleveland Constantine Browne et al v. Rodney Sebastian Clark Donalds et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02840
Defendant: Rashid Badloe, Bilal Hajji, Carolina Giraldo Navarro and others
Plaintiff: Cleveland Constantine Browne, The Estate Of Wycliffe Johnson, Steely & Clevie Productions Ltd. and others
Consolidated Defendant: El Cartel Records Inc, Andres Torres, Luis Alfonso Rodriguez Lopez-Cepero and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Darko v. Graham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03232
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ELLIOT KWABENA DARKO and Michael Elliot Kwabena Okyere Darko
Defendant: AUBREY DRAKE GRAHAM, ALEXANDER LUSTIG, CHRISTIAN BEAU ANASTASIOU ASTROP and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Incorporated
as 21-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMI FEIST CATALOG INC., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., FUELED BY RAMEN LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: COXCOM, LLC and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff: WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., W.B.M. MUSIC CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS and others
Leroy O Neil Jackson Jr. et al v. Universal Music Publishing, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00939
Plaintiff: Leroy O Neil Jackson, Jr., James Calloway, Neli Shimone Davenport and others
Defendant: Universal Music Publishing, Inc., Ty James, Mary Jane Productions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Neil Fox Parekh et al v. Abel Makkonen Tesfaye et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv07488
Plaintiff: Neil Fox Parekh and Shyhi Henry Hsaio
Defendant: Abel Makkonen Tesfaye, Adam King Feeney, Nicolas Alfredo Jaar and others
Petitioner: Eric White
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Blue Spike LLC et al v. Universal Music Group Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06331
Plaintiff: Blue Spike LLC, BLUE SPIKE INTERNATIONAL LTD and Wistaria Trading Ltd.
Defendant: Universal Music Group Inc., UMG Manufacturing & Logistics, Inc., Universal Music Publishing, Inc. d/b/a Universal Music Publishing Group and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff: Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant: Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent: MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae: Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor: Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: BCS Computers LLC
Special Master: Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?