Cases 11 - 20 of 21
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv02905
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Dinerstein v. Google, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04311
Plaintiff:
Matt Dinerstein
Defendant:
The University of Chicago, Google, LLC and The University of Chicago Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02364
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv02322
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv01276
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv00701
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Swanson Russell v. The University of Chicago Medical Center
as 4:2011cv03110
Plaintiff:
Swanson Russell
Defendant:
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC. , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
