Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Michael Keitz v. Sponsors of Cocaine Research
as 11-2016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES KEITZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED SPONSORS OF COCAINE RESEARCH STUDY, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER and others
Herbert Considder v. Medicare
as 09-2014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT ARTHUR CONSIDDER
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDICARE, AMENDISYS HOME HEALTH CARE, SALEM HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas Brown v. Rectors and Visitors of the Un
as 08-1637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS P. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
RECTORS AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA and JAMES A. MARSHALL
Bowers v. Scurry et al.
as 07-1382
Defendant:
NAT SCURRY, in his official and individual capacity, LEONARD SANDRIDGE, in his official capacity as executive vice president and chief operating officer of the University of Virginia, and in his individual capacity, UVA, by its Rector and Visitors and others
Plaintiff:
DENA BOWERS
Johnson v. Commonwealth, et al
as 07-1614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILBERT V. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER and EDWARD WALSH
Bowers v. Scurry et al.
as 07-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENA BOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NAT SCURRY, in his official and individual capacity and LUCINDA CHILDS-WHITE, in her official and individual capacity
Defendant:
UVA, by its Rector and Visitors, LEONARD SANDRIDGE, in his official capacity as executive vice president and chief operating officer of the University of Virginia, and in his individual capacity and YOKE SAN REYNOLDS, in her official capacity as chief financial officer of the University of Virginia, and in her individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
