Cases 41 - 50 of 262
WYLIE v. SAMUEL et al
as 1:2020cv01534
Respondent:
DAVID SAMUEL and UNKNOWN OWNERS
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL QUENTIN WYLIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
ELLIS v. WILSON et al
as 1:2019cv03766
Defendant:
PATRICK SCRUGGS, COHEN, LUX and others
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA A. ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETTIS v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2019cv03625
Defendant:
MONICA MILLER, UNKNOWN OWNER OF DC EXPRESS TOWING INC., DENEIL BETTIS and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME BETTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THIBEAUX v. UNKNOWN PSYCHIATRIST et al
as 1:2019cv03096
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PSYCHIATRIST, BURL CAIN, VAN BUREN and others
Plaintiff:
RAYFIELD JOSEPH THIBEAUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUSH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv02867
Defendant:
UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS, EMILY PETRINO, STACEY ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ and YUSEF O. BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROMITIE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02868
Defendant:
UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS, WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ and JAMES CROMITIE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LITTLE v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2019cv02866
Defendant:
UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Petitioner:
MARVIN C. LITTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALDERON LOPEZ v. UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS
as 1:2019cv02750
Defendant:
UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMBREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02535
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FEDERAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J.R. EMBREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
