Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Chappell v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi and Unknown Kelly
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chappell v. Biloxi Police Dept. et al
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
Biloxi Police Dept. and Unknown Kelly
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabor v. Centerion Medical Services et al
as 3:2019cv00057
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dentist Unknown Gambrell, Centerion Medical Services and Dentist Unknown Kelly
Plaintiff:
Michael Tabor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Benton et al
as 3:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Campbell
Defendant:
Unknown Benton, Unknown Kelly and LeMarcus Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez-Pedroza v. Kelly et al
as 5:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Jimenez-Pedroza
Defendant:
Unknown Kelly and Trinity Food Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dominguez-Ramirez v. Kelly et al
as 5:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Hector Dominguez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Unknown Kelly and Trinity Food Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jimenez-Pedroza et al v. Kelly et al
as 5:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Jimenez-Pedroza and Hector Dominguez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Unknown Kelly and Trinity Food Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gaillard v. Kelly et al
as 3:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Lord T. Gaillard
Defendant:
Unknown Kelly, Unknown Sheilds, K 9 Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Barker
Defendant:
Unknown Watson, John Does, Unknown Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. EMCF Host et al
as 3:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Cruzette Lofton
Defendant:
EMCF Host, Unknown Buscher, Unknown Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
