Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gemma v. Shartle et al
as 4:2019cv00382
Defendant:
R Villalva, Unknown Smythe, Unknown Madrid and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D Gemma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vasquez et al v. Madrid et al
as 4:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Orlando Vasquez
Defendant:
Unknown Madrid, Unknown Lawson and Unknown Gjurgevich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boroczk et al v. Madrid et al
as 4:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Darrick Boroczk
Defendant:
Unknown Madrid, Unknown Lawson and Unknown Gjurgevich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strouse v. Madrid et al
as 4:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Strouse
Defendant:
Unknown Madrid, Unknown Lawson and Unknown Gjurgevich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano et al v. Madrid et al
as 4:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Yahule Serrano
Defendant:
Unknown Madrid, Unknown Lawson and Unknown Gjurgevich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyajin et al v. Madrid et al
as 4:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ronald Boyajin
Defendant:
Unknown Madrid, Unknown Lawson and Unknown Gjurgevich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strouse et al v. Madrid et al
as 4:2017cv00471
Plaintiff:
James Strouse, Ronald Boyajin, Unknown Parties and others
Defendant:
Unknown Madrid, Unknown Lawson and Unknown Gjurgevich
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Darrick Boroczk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laaman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
Jaan Laaman
Defendant:
Jefferson Sessions, Mark S Inch, JT Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayala v. Apker et al
as 4:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
Miguel David Ayala
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Christopher Lamb, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00533
Plaintiff:
Brian Lyle Anderson
Defendant:
Ernie Trujillo, Unknown Madrid, Unknown Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
