Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lester Bell v. MI, et al
as 22-1962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESTER BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR DALE BONN, SERGEANT MARIO CUNNINGHAM, SERGEANT JACKSON and others
Burton #495156 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00854
Defendant:
Unknown Breedlove, Kirtida Patel, Unknown Wellman and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Burton #495156
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton #495156 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Unknown Duma, Unknown Deeren, Unknown Wellman and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Burton #495156
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell #476602 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2019cv00233
Defendant:
Unknown Sissel, Unknown Miller, Unknown Gaudio and others
Plaintiff:
Lester Bell #476602
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell #476602 v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv00522
Plaintiff:
Lester Bell #476602
Defendant:
Unknown Miller, Unknown Simmons, Unknown Skipper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guile #429156 v. Schneider et al
as 1:2015cv01069
Plaintiff:
Douglas MacArthur Guile #429156, II
Defendant:
Steven E. Schneider, Unknown Vandenakker, Unknown Grembowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Threatt v. Rick Raymond, et al
as 14-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAYMOND, Unit Chief Psychologist, UNKNOWN KISSINGER, Psychologist, UNKNOWN HOULE, Psychologist and others
Anthony Threatt v. Rick Raymond, et al
as 13-2024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAYMOND, Unit Chief Psychologist, UNKNOWN KISSINGER, Psychologist, UNKNOWN HOULE, Psychologist and others
Threatt #182625 v. Raymond et al
as 1:2013cv00422
Plaintiff:
Anthony Threatt #182625
Defendant:
Rick Raymond, Unknown Kissinger, Unknown Houle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
