Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03124
Plaintiff:
Jasper Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Nicholson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03094
Plaintiff:
Bradly Mitchell Smith
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02077
Petitioner:
Wayne Porter
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cureton v. Unnamed Defendant et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Cureton
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Lower Bed Unit Restrictive Housing Officers, FNU Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Transport Driver
as 5:2024ct03070
Plaintiff:
Dondell C. Davidson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Federal Bureau of Prisons Transport Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chavis v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03069
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ryan Chavis
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coble v. Blackburn
as 5:2024ct03065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Coble
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Brian Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03059
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03058
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Lower Bed Unit Restrictive Housing Officers, Ms. Sergeant Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
