Cases 1 - 10 of 41
MAHOOD v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
BETH MAHOOD
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SAGERMAN v. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv02665
Plaintiff:
Jason Sagerman and JASON SAGERMAN, MD
Defendant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
FEINER v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
GLENN F. FEINER
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO. and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VEDOVINO v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv01321
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. VEDOVINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv01307
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HANNA v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv00394
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO., UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION, PROVIDENT COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. HANNA, D.M.D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FIEHLER v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2020cv00334
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. FIEHLER
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOE v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2019cv00628
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. McKenney et al
as 1:2018cv01509
Defendant:
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Pamela H. Godwin, Ronald P. O'Hanley and others
Nominal Defendant:
Unum Group
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROTHMAN v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2018cv01299
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. ROTHMAN
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP , UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
